TV
Commercials in Denmark and the United States: A cross-cultural comparison
Marianne Figge, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
Abstract
This paper includes Denmark as a primary focus of cross-cultural
advertising research. A sample of 90
Danish and 99 U.S. television commercials were content analyzed. Value appeals
were found to be relatively similar, while executional styles differed between
Danish and U.S. commercials. However, advertising practices appeared
sufficiently similar that it should be
possible to standardize campaigns for
the two markets.
Introduction
As the world of goods becomes increasingly global, the issue of
standardization or adaptation of marketing is of utmost importance to
international companies (Douglas and Wind, 1987; Onkvisit and Shaw, 1987; Jain,
1989, Papavassiliou and Stathakopoulos, 1997).
Advertising may be one of the most difficult aspects of the marketing
mix to standardize, because advertising is strongly culture-bound, dependent on
cultural factors such as language, values, lifestyle, communication style, and
media habits (Harris, 1984; Sandler and Shani, 1992; De Mooij, 1998). Even in cultures that are
perceived as relatively close, such as the United States and Great Britain, significant
differences in advertising have been demonstrated (Weinberger and Spotts,
1989a; Weinberger and Spotts, 1989b; Katz and Lee, 1992; Bradley et al., 1994;
Caillat and Mueller, 1996). As a major advertising
nation, the United States is included in most cross-cultural advertising
studies; thus it becomes a benchmark for analysis. Denmark, on the other hand,
is very rarely studied in this context. While other Nordic countries,
particularly Sweden, are represented in international advertising studies
(Martenson, 1987; Wiles et al., 1996), Denmark has only been
included in a few studies of multiple countries, mostly in the form of
secondary data (Synodinos et al., 1989; Zandpour et al., 1994; De Mooij, 1998).
The objective of the present study is to contribute to the body of
cross-cultural advertising research by including Denmark as a primary focus of
analysis, and by providing a comparison of television commercials in the United
States and Denmark.
Denmark and the United States are alike in that both are Western,
industrialized nations with a high standard of living, and both cultures are
highly individualistic (Hofstede, 1984; Triandis, 1998). However, there are also
considerable differences between the two nations. In addition to differences
such as history, political system, and sheer size and influence of each nation,
there are cultural differences which may affect consumer behavior and
advertising. For example, Americans are often characterized by placing a high
value on status, success, achievement, and competition. American children are
encouraged to be number one, students usually know their class rank, and awards
for various accomplishments are common. There is a general emphasis on winning,
having a career, making money and displaying status through possessions. This
is captured in the American dream of the individual who raises from poverty by
using skills and hard work to become wealthy and influential (e.g., Stewart,
1972; Boorstin, 1973; Hall and Hall, 1990). A very different attitude is
prevalent in Denmark. People skills, cooperation and equality are valued higher
than success and status. In schools, the ideal is a mid-level of performance,
where most students can participate. Competition and achievement are not
encouraged, and the process is considered more important than the results. It
is bad taste to flaunt success, or attempt to be better than others. There is a
tendency to favor the the average, the middle-of-the road, rather than the
special or the great (Himmelstrup, 1992; Østergård, 1992; Hastrup, 1995;
Strange, 1996). Politically, this is reflected in a welfare society based on a
notion of solidarity and equality, in contrast to the political system in the
US, which tends to favor personal initiative and provide only minimal help for
the less fortunate (Triandis, 1995).
Such cultural differences also affect consumer behavior and
advertising. For example, U.S. consumers may show more interest in displaying
wealth and succes, and advertising appeals to status and achievement, as well
as celebrity endorsements, may be used frequently. Danish ads, on the other
hand, may be expected to reflect softer values such as relationships and
enjoyment, and to feature "ordinary people" rather than celebrities.
Furthermore, it may be expected that Danish advertisements display a soft,
indirect selling approach while aggressive, direct approaches are more common
in the U.S. (Hofstede et al., 1998).
This leads to the following hypotheses:
H1: U.S. commercials will appeal to values of status, success, and achievement more frequently than Danish commercials
H2: Danish commercials will appeal to values of relationship and
enjoyment more often than U.S. commercials
H3: U.S. commercials will use celebrity endorsement more often than Danish commercials
H4: U.S. commercials will use direct approaches such as straight announcer, direct response, and product information more often than Danish commercials
H5: Danish commercials will use approaches featuring "ordinary people" (e.g., slice-of-life, testimonial) more often than U.S. commercials
H6: Danish commercials will use indirect, symbolic approaches (e.g., visual/image, dramatization) more often than U.S. commercials.
Selection and Coding of Commercials
The commercials in the sample were randomly selected from videotapes of
primetime television in Denmark and the United States during two weeks of April
and May, 1998. Danish commercials were taped from the TV2, the only commercial
channel in Denmark that are available to all television households, and is
broadcast form Denmark. U.S. commercials were taped from the four major
American networks, ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox. After repeats were deleted from the
sample, a total of 99 U.S. commercials and 90 Danish commercials were included
in the analysis. Commercials were coded by native coders in each country. The
coding included country, length (in seconds), language, product category, value,
and executional strategy. Coders were
instructed to identify one main value and one main strategy for each
commercial. All variables except length were dummy coded (Zandpour et al,
1992), and chi square analyses were performed. The X2 values indicate differences in the frequencies of
each variable in relation to country.
Description of Values and Executional Strategy
The main units of analysis in this study are values and executional
strategy. Values are manifestations of the content, theme, or appeal, the
"what is said" of the ad. The study of values in advertising was
pioneered by Pollay, who has identified a comprehensive list of values manifest
in US advertising during the 20th century (Pollay, 1983; Pollay, 1984, Belk and
Pollay, 1985). Pollay's list of values was
modified and shortened by Cheng and Schweitzer (1996) for the purpose of
comparing values in U.S. and Chinese TV commercials. The list used in this
study contains 23 values and is based on Cheng and Schweitzer (see Appendix,
Table A).
Executional strategy describes
the communication style or approach, the "how it is said" of the ad.
An exhaustive list of possible strategies does not exist, and deciding which
strategies to include is largely a matter of the desired level of detail,
analytical goals, and specific characteristics of the actual sample. This study
uses a list of 16 strategies, which is compiled from several advertising
textbooks and academic papers (Laskey et al., 1989; Burton, 1990; Nelson, 1994), and modified to fit the
present data set and goals (see Appendix, Table B).
Language
All commercials in the U.S. sample were in
English. In Denmark, 82% of ads were in Danish, 10% were in English, and the
rest were in another language, or a mix of languages (Table 2).
|
|
Denmark (n = 90) |
U.S. (n = 99) |
||
|
Length (seconds) |
frequency |
% |
frequency |
% |
|
10 |
6 |
6.7 |
|
|
|
15 |
13 |
14.4 |
21 |
21.2 |
|
20 |
15 |
16.7 |
|
|
|
25 |
8 |
8.9 |
|
|
|
30 |
38 |
42.2 |
78 |
78.8 |
|
35 |
4 |
4.4 |
|
|
|
40 |
2 |
2.2 |
|
|
|
45 |
2 |
2.2 |
|
|
|
50 |
1 |
1.1 |
|
|
|
60 |
1 |
1.1 |
|
|
TABLE 2
Language of Danish and U.S.
Commercials
|
|
Denmark (n = 90) |
U.S. (n = 99) |
|
||
|
Language |
Frequency |
% |
Frequency |
% |
X2 valuesa (df = 1) |
|
English |
9 |
10 |
99 |
100 |
155.935*** |
|
Danish |
74 |
82.2 |
0 |
0 |
133.779*** |
|
Other |
7 |
7.8 |
0 |
0 |
7.996** |
aX2 values indicate the
frequency of each language by country
** = p < .01, *** = p < .001
Product Category
The most common category in both countries was
food and beverages, covering 23.3% of the Danish commercials and 26.3% of the
US commercials (Table 3). In Denmark, this was followed by entertainment and
tourism (20%), while the rest of the categories were distributed fairly evenly
around 8-10%, except autos which only represented 3% of the Danish
commercials. Two categories were more
common in Denmark than in the U.S., namely furnishings/home decoration (p < .01) and department/grocery stores (p < .05). In the U.S., personal care & clothes (21%), and
autos (19%) were the most frequent categories after food and beverages, and
both were significantly more common than in Denmark (p < .05; p < .01).
Values
Just a few values were common in each country,
and there was considerable overlap in the most popular values between countries
(Table 4). In Denmark, the most common values were enjoyment (16.7%), quality
(14.4%) and economy (13.3%), followed by family and friends (6.7%), and
convenience (6.7%). In the US, the most common value was also enjoyment
(25.3%), followed by beauty (13.1%), quality (11.1%), adventure (7.1%)
TABLE 3
Frequencies of Product
Categories in Danish and U.S. Television Commercials
|
|
Denmark (n = 90) |
U.S. (n = 99) |
|
||
|
Product categories |
Frequency |
% |
Frequencies |
% |
X2 valuesa
(df = 1) |
|
Food & beverages |
21 |
23.3 |
26 |
26.3 |
.217 |
|
Personal care & clothes |
9 |
10 |
21 |
21.2 |
4.438* |
|
Phones, PCs |
8 |
8.9 |
7 |
7.1 |
.213 |
|
Furnishings & home decoration |
7 |
7.8 |
0 |
0 |
7.996** |
|
Entertainment & travel |
18 |
20 |
12 |
12.1 |
2.191 |
|
Auto |
3 |
3.3 |
19 |
19.2 |
11.527** |
|
Services |
9 |
10 |
4 |
4 |
2.614 |
|
Department or grocery stores |
8 |
8.9 |
2 |
2 |
4.438* |
|
Miscellaneous |
7 |
7.8 |
8 |
8.1 |
.006 |
aX2 values indicate the
differences in the frequencies of each product category by country.
* p < .05, ** p. < 01
and convenience (6.1%). Among the most dominant values, only one was
significantly different between countries. This value was "beauty,"
which was used more often (p <
.01) in the U.S. than in Denmark. The value of beauty is also related to the
product category of personal care and clothes (correlation coefficient = .688, p < .001), which is more common (p < .05) in the U.S. than in Denmark.
The only other significant difference between the values manifest in the two
countries was in the case of "status," which appeared more often in
Danish (p < .05) than in U.S.
commercials.
Drama and product information were the most common strategies both in
Denmark and the U.S. (Table 5). Drama was the executional style in 20% of the
U.S. commercials and 22% of the Danish commercials, and product information was
used by 18.9% of commercials in Denmark and 17.2% in the U.S. In Denmark, this
was followed by slice of life (15.6%) and visual/image (13.3%). Both slice of
life (p < .001) and visual/image (p < .05) were used significantly more
often in Denmark. A company spokesperson-approach was also used significantly
more often in Denmark ( p < .05).
In the US, the most popular strategies after drama and product information were
straight announcer (17.2%), and celebrity endorsement (16.2%). Both straight
announcer (p < .05) and celebrity
endorsement (p < .01).were used
significantly more often in the U.S. than in Denmark.
The results of this study indicate that there are some differences
between advertising in Denmark and the United States, though not always in the
expected direction. The differences appear to exist mainly in format and executional
style rather than content.
Length
U.S. commercials in this sample adhered to a much more standardized
format than did Danish commercials. All the U.S. commercials in the sample were
either 15 or 30 seconds long, while the Danish commercials varied from 10 to 60
seconds, with every 5-second interval in-between represented. This does not
pose a problem for U.S. advertisers operating in Denmark, but Danish
advertisers attempting to standardize advertising for the U.S. market should be
aware of this formal constraint.
Language
While English was the only language that appeared in U.S. commercials,
languages other than Danish were represented in 17.8% of the Danish
commercials, with English being the most common. This finding indicate that it
is possible, at least in some cases, to use English-language commercials as a
standardized approach in both countries.
Product Category
While food and beverages was the most common product category in both
countries, there was considerable variation across other categories.
Advertisers should be aware of this difference in competitive clutter, as it
might affect creative decisions. For example, U.S. automobile advertisers, who
are used to a very competitive advertising environment in the U.S., would meet
very few competitors should they choose to advertise in Danish television.
Commercials that are particularly designed to break through the competitive
clutter may thus not be necessary, or desirable, in the Danish market.
TABLE 4
Frequencies of Values
in Danish and U.S. Television Commercials
|
|
Denmark (n = 90) |
U.S.
(n = 99) |
|
||
|
Value |
Frequencies |
% |
Frequencies |
% |
X2
valuesa (df = 1) |
|
Adventure |
5 |
5.6 |
7 |
7.1 |
.182 |
|
Beauty |
2 |
2.2 |
13 |
13.1 |
7.678** |
|
Conformity |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
.914 |
|
Convenience |
6 |
6.7 |
6 |
6.1 |
.029 |
|
Curiosity |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1.838 |
|
Cutting edge |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
.914 |
|
Economy |
12 |
13.3 |
10 |
10.1 |
.479 |
|
Efficiency |
5 |
5.6 |
3 |
3 |
.742 |
|
Enjoyment |
15 |
16.7 |
25 |
25.3 |
2.083 |
|
Family & friends |
6 |
6.7 |
2 |
2 |
2.511 |
|
Health |
4 |
4.4 |
5 |
5.1 |
.038 |
|
Individualism |
1 |
1.1 |
1 |
1 |
.005 |
|
Love and sex |
4 |
4.4 |
1 |
1 |
2.159 |
|
Modernity |
4 |
4.4 |
4 |
4 |
.019 |
|
Nationalism |
1 |
1.1 |
0 |
0 |
1.106 |
|
Naturalness |
2 |
2.2 |
0 |
0 |
2.224 |
|
Neatness |
1 |
1.1 |
0 |
0 |
1.106 |
|
Quality |
13 |
14.4 |
11 |
11.1 |
.472 |
|
Safety |
1 |
1.1 |
3 |
3 |
.838 |
|
Social validation |
2 |
2.2 |
1 |
1 |
.443 |
|
Status/achievement |
5 |
5.6 |
0 |
0 |
5.649* |
|
Tradition/nostalgia |
1 |
1.1 |
2 |
2 |
.249 |
|
Uniqueness |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
.914 |
aX2 values indicate the
differences in the frequencies of each value by country.
* p <
.05, ** p. < 01
TABLE 5
Frequencies of Executional
Strategy in Danish and U.S. Television Commercials
|
|
Denmark (n = 90) |
U.S. (n = 99) |
|
||
|
Executional strategy |
Frequencies |
% |
Frequencies |
% |
X2
values a (df = 1) |
|
Animation |
3 |
3.3 |
4 |
4 |
.006 |
|
Straight announcer |
6 |
6.7 |
17 |
17.2 |
4.867* |
|
Celebrity endorsement |
3 |
3.3 |
16 |
16.2 |
8.580** |
|
Company spokesperson |
4 |
4.4 |
0 |
0 |
4.495* |
|
Comparative |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
.914 |
|
Direct response |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1.838 |
|
Drama |
18 |
20 |
22 |
22.2 |
.140 |
|
Institutional |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
.914 |
|
Musical |
1 |
1.1 |
3 |
3 |
.838 |
|
Product information |
17 |
18.9 |
17 |
17.2 |
.094 |
|
Slice-of-life |
14 |
15.6 |
1 |
1 |
13.651*** |
|
Special effects |
4 |
4.4 |
0 |
0 |
4.495* |
|
Testimonial, real |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
.914 |
|
Testimonial, quasi |
4 |
4.4 |
7 |
7.1 |
.593 |
|
Testimonial, expert |
4 |
4.4 |
2 |
2 |
.901 |
|
Visual/image |
12 |
13.3 |
5 |
5.1 |
3.951* |
aX2 values indicate the
differences in the frequencies of each executional strategy by country.
* p <.05, ** p. < .01, *** p < .001
Values
The expected differences outlined in H1 and H2 did not appear. There
was a significant difference in the frequency of status appeals, but not in the
predicted direction. Status was in fact a more popular appeal in Denmark, thus
H1 was not supported. This may indicate that displaying status is becoming more
acceptable in Denmark. It is also possible that status is implied in American
commercials rather than being explicitly stated. For example, the executional
strategy of celebrity endorsement utilizes the status of the celebrity. The
prevalence of the value "beauty" in the U.S. commercials may also be
an indication of this, as it may express a cultural emphasis on good looks and
glamour. As predicted, relationship values (i.e., family & friends, love and
sex) were used more often in Denmark than in the U.S., but the differences were
not significant. Enjoyment was the most common value in both countries, and it
was used more often in the U.S. than in Denmark. Thus H2 was not supported.
Overall, the values manifest in Danish and U.S. television commercials
were relatively similar, indicating that consumers in the two countries respond
to the same appeals, at least in relation to consumption. The utilitarian
values of economy, quality, and convenience appeared to be popular appeals in
both countries, as well as the hedonistic values of enjoyment and adventure.
Consequently, it should be feasible to design advertising which appeals to
values that are salient in both cultures.
Executional Strategy
The two most common executional styles in both Danish and U.S.
commercials were the symbolic approach of drama, and the rational approach of
product information. But there were considerable differences in the use of
other executional strategies. Compared to Danish commercials, American
commercials were significantly more likely to use the glamorous approach of
celebrity endorsements, thus H3 was supported.
U.S. commercials were also more likely than Danish commercials to use
the direct selling approach of a straight announcer, thus partially supporting
H4. Danish commercials, on the other hand, were more likely to feature ordinary
people in a slice-of-life approach, and to use the soft-sell, emotional approach of visual/image. Thus H5 and H6
were both partially supported.
These findings are consistent with other cross-cultural studies
involving the U.S. and European countries. For example, Martenson (1987) showed
that a hard sell approach with frequent calls to action was more common for
U.S. than for Swedish commercials. U.S. commercials were also more likely to
use product facts and "reason why" arguments, as well as celebrity
endorsements, in comparison with French commercials (Zandpour et al., 1992).
Consequently, not all approaches appear equally useful in both the U.S.
and Denmark. Some of the approaches that are most popular in one country are
rare in the other. However, the executional approaches of drama and product
information are frequent in both Denmark and the United States, and may thus be
worth considering for marketers operating in both countries. This is not to say
that any drama or any product information commercial is transferrable. However,
if a marketer desires to create a standardized campaign for the two countries,
it might be desirable to consider one of those two strategies.
Implications
The findings of this study indicate that there are various important differences between advertising practices in the United States and Denmark, but that there are also considerable similarities. While not all approaches and appeals work in both Denmark and the U.S. there is enough overlap that it appears possible to design campaigns that are standardized for both cultures
Reference List
Belk,
R.W., & R. W. Pollay, (1985) "Images of Ourselves: The Good Life in
Twentieth Century Advertising," Journal
of Consumer Research, 11(March),
887-897.
Boorstin,
D.J., (1973) The Americans. The
Democratic Experience, New
York: Random House.
Bradley,
S., Hitchon, J., & Thorson, E., (1994), "Hard Sell Versus Soft Sell: A
Comparison of American and British Advertising," in B. G. Englis (Ed.), Global and Multinational Advertising.
(pp. 141-157), Hillsdale, New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Burton,
P.W., (1990), Advertising
Copywriting, Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.
Caillat,
Z., & Mueller, B., (1996),
"Observations: The Influence of Culture on American and British
Advertising: An Exploratory Comparison of Beer Advertising," Journal of Advertising Research, (May/June),
79-88.
Cheng,
H., & Schweitzer, J.C., (1996), "Cultural Values Reflected in Chinese
and U.S. Television Commercials," Journal
of Advertising Research, (May/June), 27-45.
De
Mooij, M. (1998), Global Marketing
and Advertising. Understanding Cultural Paradoxes, London:
Sage.
Douglas,
S.P., & Wind, Y. (1987), "The Myth of Globalization," Columbia Journal of World Business, (Winter),
19-30.
Hall,
E.T., & Hall, M.R. (1990), Understanding
Cultural Differences. Germans, French, and Americans, Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press, Inc.
Harris,
G. (1984), "The Globalization of Advertising," International Journal of Advertising, (3),
223-234.
Hastrup,
B. (1995), Contemporary Danish
Society: Danish Democracy and Social Welfare, Denmark: Akademisk
Forlag.
Himmelstrup,
P.(ed.), (1992), Opdag Danmark - om
Danmark og danskerne før, nu og i fremtiden, Herning, Denmark: systime
a/s.
Hofstede, G., (1984), Culture's Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values, Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Hofstede, G., & Associates, (1998).
Masculinity and Femininity. The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
Jain,
S.C., (1989), "Standardization of International Marketing Strategy: Some
Research Hypotheses," Journal
of Marketing, 53, 70-79.
Katz,
H., & Lee, W.-N., (1992), "Oceans Apart: an Initial Exploration of
Social Communication Differences in US and UK Prime-time Television
Advertising," International
Journal of Advertising, (11), 69-82.
Laskey,
H.A., Day, E., & Crask, M.R., (1989), "Typology of Main Message
Strategies for Television Commercials,"
Journal of Advertising, 18(1),
36-41.
Martenson,
R., (1987), "Advertising Strategies and Information Content in American
and Swedish Advertising. A Comparative Content Analysis in Cross-Cultural Copy
Research," International
Journal of Advertising, (6), 133-144.
Nelson,
R.P., (1994), The Design of
Advertising (7th ed.), Dubuque, IA: WCB Brown and Benchmark.
Onkvisit,
S., & Shaw, J.J., (1987), "Standardized International Advertising: A
Review and Critical Evaluation of the Theoretical and Empirical
Evidence," Columbia Journal of
World Business, 22(Fall), 43-55.
Papavassiliou,
N., & Stathakopoulos, V., (1997), "Standardization versus adaptation
of international advertising strategies: Towards a framework," European Journal of Marketing, 31(7), 504-527.
Pollay,
R.W., (1983), "Measuring the Cultural Values Manifest in
Advertising," in J. H. Leigh & C. R. Martin (Eds.), Current Issues and Research in Advertising,
(pp. 71-92), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Graduate School of
Business Division of Research.
Pollay,
R.W., (1984), "The Identification and Distribution of Values Manifest in
Print Advertising 1900-1980," in R. E. Pitts & A. G. Woodside (Eds.), Personal Values and Consumer Psychology
(pp. 111-135), Lexington,
Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
Sandler,
D.M., & Shani, D., (1992), "Brand Globally, but Advertise Locally? An
Empirical Investigation," International
Marketing Review, 9(4), 18-31.
Stewart,
E.C. (1972), American Cultural
Patterns: A Cross-Cultural Perspective,
Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural
Press, Inc.
Strange,
M., (1996), Culture Shock! Denmark, London:
Kuperard.
Synodinos,
N.E., Keown, C.F., & Jacobs, L.W., (1989), "Transnational Advertising
Practices: A Survey of Leading Brand Advertisers in Fifteen
Countries," Journal of
Advertising Research, (April/May), 43-50.
Triandis, H.C.,
(1995), Individualism &
Collectivism, Boulder: Westview Press.
Weinberger, M.G., & Spotts, H.E., (1989a), "A Situational View of
Information Content in TV Advertising in the U.S. and U.K.," Journal of Marketing, 53(January), 89-94.
Weinberger, M., & Spotts, H., (1989b),
"Humor in U.S. Versus U.K. TV Advertising," Journal of Advertising, 18(2), 39-44.
Wiles, C.R., Wiles, J.A., & Tjernlund, A, (1996), "The Ideology of
Advertising: The United States and Sweden," Journal of Advertising Research, (May/June), 57-66.
Zandpour, F., Campos, V., Catalano, J., Chang, C., Cho, Y.D., Hoobyar, R.,
Jiang, S.-F., Lin, M.-C., Madrid, S., Scheideler, H., & Osborn, S.T.,
(1994), "Global Reach and Local Touch: Achieving Cultural Fitness in TV
Advertising," Journal of
Advertising Research, 34(5), 35-63.
Zandpour, F., Chang, C., & Catalano, J., (1992), "Stories, Symbols,
and Straight Talk: A Comparative Analysis of Frence, Taiwanese, and U.S. TV
Commercials," Journal of
Advertising Research, (January/February), 25-38.
Østergård, U. (ed.), (1992), Dansk
Identitet? Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Appendix
TABLE A
Values Manifest in Danish and
U.S. Television Commercials
Value
|
Description
|
|
Adventure |
Desire to experience boldness, daring, courage, thrill |
|
Beauty |
Desire to be beautiful, attractive, lovely |
Conformity
|
Desire to fit in, be part of a crowd |
Convenience/
comfort
|
Desire to
eliminate work, do things more easily, rest, relaxation
|
Curiosity
|
Desire for
mental stimulation, broadening horizons, acquiring knowledge
|
Cutting edge
|
Desire to be
trendy, in fashion
|
Economy
|
Desire to save money, be thrifty |
Efficiency
|
Desire to
accomplish things effortlessly
|
Enjoyment
|
Desire for
pleasure, fun, sensory stimulation
|
Family/friends
|
Desire for
togetherness, affection, closeness
|
Health
|
Desire for good
health, longevity, youthful vigor
|
Individualism
|
Desire to be
self-sufficient and self-reliant
|
Love and sex
|
Desire for
romantic love, a good sex life
|
Modernity/
newness
|
Desire to be
contemporary, up-to-date, technologically advanced
|
Naturalness
|
Desire for
harmony between human and nature, ”back-to-nature”
|
Neatness
|
Desire to be clean and tidy |
Quality
|
Desire for products of good quality/good taste |
Safety
|
Desire to feel safe and secure |
Status/success/
achievement
|
Desire for
money, power, prestige, material possesions
|
Tradition/
nostalgia
|
Desire to be
connected to history, customs, the past
|
Uniqueness
|
Desire to be
distinct from others
|
Executional Strategies Used
to Categorize Danish and U.S. Television Commercials
|
Executional strategy |
Description |
|
Animation |
Animated characters play a major role in the commercial |
|
Straight announcer |
An anonymous announcer, usually off-screen, delivers the main message
of the commercial |
|
Celebrity endorsement |
A celebrity is talking about the product or plays a major role in the
commercial |
|
Company spokesperson |
Someone representing the company talks about the product. |
|
Comparative |
The brand is compared to one or more products in the same category |
|
Direct response |
The product is sold on-screen, through a tollfree phone number |
|
Drama/ narrative |
Fictional characters in a fictional setting. May or may not have a
plot/story line. |
|
Institutional |
Reinforces company image, without attempting to sell a particular
product |
|
Musical |
The focus of the commercial is song/dance/music |
|
Product information |
Information about product features such as price, value, or
performance |
|
Slice-of-life |
Ordinary people (usually models) shown in some everyday situation |
|
Special effects |
The major part of the commercial features some kind of special
effects |
|
Testimonial, real |
An actual person talking directly to the audience about the merits of
a product. |
|
Testimonial, quasi |
A model pretending to be an ordinary person talking about the merits
of a product |
|
Testimonial, expert |
Someone possessing expert knowledge about the product talks about its
merits |
|
Visual/image |
The primary focus is on building an image/emotional appeal around the
product |